Objects are the mapping type in JSON. They map “keys” to “values”. In JSON, the “keys” must always be strings. Each of these pairs is conventionally referred to as a “property”.
In Python, "objects" are analogous to the dict type. An
important difference, however, is that while Python dictionaries
may use anything hashable as a key, in JSON all the keys
must be strings.
Try not to be confused by the two uses of the word "object" here:
Python uses the word object to mean the generic base class for
everything, whereas in JSON it is used only to mean a mapping from
string keys to values.
In Ruby, "objects" are analogous to the Hash type. An important
difference, however, is that all keys in JSON must be strings, and therefore
any non-string keys are converted over to their string representation.
Try not to be confused by the two uses of the word "object" here:
Ruby uses the word Object to mean the generic base class for
everything, whereas in JSON it is used only to mean a mapping from
string keys to values.
{ "type": "object" }
{
"key" : "value",
"another_key" : "another_value"
}
{
"Sun" : 1.9891e30,
"Jupiter" : 1.8986e27,
"Saturn" : 5.6846e26,
"Neptune" : 10.243e25,
"Uranus" : 8.6810e25,
"Earth" : 5.9736e24,
"Venus" : 4.8685e24,
"Mars" : 6.4185e23,
"Mercury" : 3.3022e23,
"Moon" : 7.349e22,
"Pluto" : 1.25e22
}
Using non-strings as keys is invalid JSON:
{
0.01 : "cm"
1 : "m",
1000 : "km"
}
"Not an object"
["An", "array", "not", "an", "object"]
The properties (key-value pairs) on an object are defined using the
properties keyword. The value of properties is an object,
where each key is the name of a property and each value is a JSON
schema used to validate that property.
For example, let’s say we want to define a simple schema for an address made up of a number, street name and street type:
{
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"number": { "type": "number" },
"street_name": { "type": "string" },
"street_type": { "type": "string",
"enum": ["Street", "Avenue", "Boulevard"]
}
}
}
{ "number": 1600, "street_name": "Pennsylvania", "street_type": "Avenue" }
If we provide the number in the wrong type, it is invalid:
{ "number": "1600", "street_name": "Pennsylvania", "street_type": "Avenue" }
By default, leaving out properties is valid. See Required Properties.
{ "number": 1600, "street_name": "Pennsylvania" }
By extension, even an empty object is valid:
{ }
By default, providing additional properties is valid:
{ "number": 1600, "street_name": "Pennsylvania", "street_type": "Avenue",
"direction": "NW" }
The additionalProperties keyword is used to control the handling
of extra stuff, that is, properties whose names are not listed in the
properties keyword. By default any additional properties are
allowed.
The additionalProperties keyword may be either a boolean or an
object. If additionalProperties is a boolean and set to false, no
additional properties will be allowed.
Reusing the example above, but this time setting
additionalProperties to false.
{
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"number": { "type": "number" },
"street_name": { "type": "string" },
"street_type": { "type": "string",
"enum": ["Street", "Avenue", "Boulevard"]
}
},
"additionalProperties": false
}
{ "number": 1600, "street_name": "Pennsylvania", "street_type": "Avenue" }
Since additionalProperties is false, this extra
property “direction” makes the object invalid:
{ "number": 1600, "street_name": "Pennsylvania", "street_type": "Avenue",
"direction": "NW" }
If additionalProperties is an object, that object is a schema that will
be used to validate any additional properties not listed in properties.
For example, one can allow additional properties, but only if they are each a string:
{
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"number": { "type": "number" },
"street_name": { "type": "string" },
"street_type": { "type": "string",
"enum": ["Street", "Avenue", "Boulevard"]
}
},
"additionalProperties": { "type": "string" }
}
{ "number": 1600, "street_name": "Pennsylvania", "street_type": "Avenue" }
This is valid, since the additional property’s value is a string:
{ "number": 1600, "street_name": "Pennsylvania", "street_type": "Avenue",
"direction": "NW" }
This is invalid, since the additional property’s value is not a string:
{ "number": 1600, "street_name": "Pennsylvania", "street_type": "Avenue",
"office_number": 201 }
By default, the properties defined by the properties keyword are
not required. However, one can provide a list of required properties
using the required keyword.
The required keyword takes an array of zero or more strings. Each
of these strings must be unique.
required must contain at least one string.In the following example schema defining a user record, we require that each user has a name and e-mail address, but we don’t mind if they don’t provide their address or telephone number:
{
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"name": { "type": "string" },
"email": { "type": "string" },
"address": { "type": "string" },
"telephone": { "type": "string" }
},
"required": ["name", "email"]
}
{
"name": "William Shakespeare",
"email": "bill@stratford-upon-avon.co.uk"
}
Providing extra properties is fine, even properties not defined in the schema:
{
"name": "William Shakespeare",
"email": "bill@stratford-upon-avon.co.uk",
"address": "Henley Street, Stratford-upon-Avon, Warwickshire, England",
"authorship": "in question"
}
Missing the required “email” property makes the JSON document invalid:
{
"name": "William Shakespeare",
"address": "Henley Street, Stratford-upon-Avon, Warwickshire, England",
}
New in draft 6
The names of properties can be validated against a schema, irrespective of their values. This can be useful if you don’t want to enforce specific properties, but you want to make sure that the names of those properties follow a specific convention. You might, for example, want to enforce that all names are valid ASCII tokens so they can be used as attributes in a particular programming language.
{
"type": "object",
"propertyNames": {
"pattern": "^[A-Za-z_][A-Za-z0-9_]*$"
}
}
{
"_a_proper_token_001": "value"
}
{
"001 invalid": "value"
}
Since object keys must always be strings anyway, so it is implied that the
schema given to propertyNames is always at least:
{ "type": "string" }
The number of properties on an object can be restricted using the
minProperties and maxProperties keywords. Each of these
must be a non-negative integer.
{
"type": "object",
"minProperties": 2,
"maxProperties": 3
}
{}
{ "a": 0 }
{ "a": 0, "b": 1 }
{ "a": 0, "b": 1, "c": 2 }
{ "a": 0, "b": 1, "c": 2, "d": 3 }
Note
This is an advanced feature of JSON Schema. Windy road ahead.
The dependencies keyword allows the schema of the object to change
based on the presence of certain special properties.
There are two forms of dependencies in JSON Schema:
Let’s start with the simpler case of property dependencies. For
example, suppose we have a schema representing a customer. If you
have their credit card number, you also want to ensure you have a
billing address. If you don’t have their credit card number, a
billing address would not be required. We represent this dependency
of one property on another using the dependencies keyword. The
value of the dependencies keyword is an object. Each entry in the
object maps from the name of a property, p, to an array of strings
listing properties that are required whenever p is present.
In the following example, whenever a credit_card property is
provided, a billing_address property must also be present:
{
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"name": { "type": "string" },
"credit_card": { "type": "number" },
"billing_address": { "type": "string" }
},
"required": ["name"],
"dependencies": {
"credit_card": ["billing_address"]
}
}
{
"name": "John Doe",
"credit_card": 5555555555555555,
"billing_address": "555 Debtor's Lane"
}
This instance has a credit_card, but it’s missing a
billing_address.
{
"name": "John Doe",
"credit_card": 5555555555555555
}
This is okay, since we have neither a credit_card, or a
billing_address.
{
"name": "John Doe"
}
Note that dependencies are not bidirectional. It’s okay to have a billing address without a credit card number.
{
"name": "John Doe",
"billing_address": "555 Debtor's Lane"
}
To fix the last issue above (that dependencies are not bidirectional), you can, of course, define the bidirectional dependencies explicitly:
{
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"name": { "type": "string" },
"credit_card": { "type": "number" },
"billing_address": { "type": "string" }
},
"required": ["name"],
"dependencies": {
"credit_card": ["billing_address"],
"billing_address": ["credit_card"]
}
}
This instance has a credit_card, but it’s missing a
billing_address.
{
"name": "John Doe",
"credit_card": 5555555555555555
}
This has a billing_address, but is missing a
credit_card.
{
"name": "John Doe",
"billing_address": "555 Debtor's Lane"
}
Schema dependencies work like property dependencies, but instead of just specifying other required properties, they can extend the schema to have other constraints.
For example, here is another way to write the above:
{
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"name": { "type": "string" },
"credit_card": { "type": "number" }
},
"required": ["name"],
"dependencies": {
"credit_card": {
"properties": {
"billing_address": { "type": "string" }
},
"required": ["billing_address"]
}
}
}
{
"name": "John Doe",
"credit_card": 5555555555555555,
"billing_address": "555 Debtor's Lane"
}
This instance has a credit_card, but it’s missing a
billing_address:
{
"name": "John Doe",
"credit_card": 5555555555555555
}
This has a billing_address, but is missing a
credit_card. This passes, because here billing_address
just looks like an additional property:
{
"name": "John Doe",
"billing_address": "555 Debtor's Lane"
}
As we saw above, additionalProperties can restrict the object so
that it either has no additional properties that weren’t explicitly
listed, or it can specify a schema for any additional properties on
the object. Sometimes that isn’t enough, and you may want to restrict
the names of the extra properties, or you may want to say that, given
a particular kind of name, the value should match a particular schema.
That’s where patternProperties comes in: it is a new keyword that
maps from regular expressions to schemas. If an additional property
matches a given regular expression, it must also validate against the
corresponding schema.
Note
When defining the regular expressions, it’s important to note that
the expression may match anywhere within the property name. For
example, the regular expression "p" will match any property
name with a p in it, such as "apple", not just a property
whose name is simply "p". It’s therefore usually less
confusing to surround the regular expression in ^...$, for
example, "^p$".
In this example, any additional properties whose names start with the
prefix S_ must be strings, and any with the prefix I_ must be
integers. Any properties explicitly defined in the properties
keyword are also accepted, and any additional properties that do not
match either regular expression are forbidden.
{
"type": "object",
"patternProperties": {
"^S_": { "type": "string" },
"^I_": { "type": "integer" }
},
"additionalProperties": false
}
{ "S_25": "This is a string" }
{ "I_0": 42 }
If the name starts with S_, it must be a string
{ "S_0": 42 }
If the name starts with I_, it must be an integer
{ "I_42": "This is a string" }
This is a key that doesn’t match any of the regular expressions:
{ "keyword": "value" }
patternProperties can be used in conjunction with
additionalProperties. In that case, additionalProperties will
refer to any properties that are not explicitly listed in
properties and don’t match any of the patternProperties. In
the following example, based on above, we add a "builtin"
property, which must be a number, and declare that all additional
properties (that are neither built-in or matched by
patternProperties) must be strings:
{
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"builtin": { "type": "number" }
},
"patternProperties": {
"^S_": { "type": "string" },
"^I_": { "type": "integer" }
},
"additionalProperties": { "type": "string" }
}
{ "builtin": 42 }
This is a key that doesn’t match any of the regular expressions:
{ "keyword": "value" }
It must be a string:
{ "keyword": 42 }